Avoid TypeError while coercing string to int

 






 

 


  Review Request #9940
  —
  Created May 15, 2018 and submitted 

 


















 

  

   Information

  





 
 

  brennie
 









 
 

  RBTools
 









 
 

  release-1.0.x
 









 
 

  4364
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  be2c67d...
 






 




 

  

   Reviewers

  





 
 

  rbtools
 









 
 

  
 






 








 





  


 
 

  
A change in the rbtools patch support a while back regressed the

behaviour of the -p flag that is passed to patch(1). We now no longer

assume that is an int and just splat it into the string to avoid a

TypeError when p is a string like '4'.

 








  


 
 

  
Ran unit tests.

 







 









 





  








 






 
 
 

  

   

    

     
    

    
    
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
    

   

   

    
     

      Description
      From
      Last Updated
     

    
    



     

      
       
       
We should convert to int before doing this check, no? '-1' >= 0 returns True. Alternatively, I think this is …

      		
      
       daviddavid
      
      
       
      
     


    
   

  

 







 






  

 



















 




 




 














 





 

  

   




david




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
david


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
      rbtools/clients/__init__.py
      


       (Diff revision 1)


      
     
    
    
       
   
    
     
    

    
     
    

       
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    We should convert to int before doing this check, no? '-1' >= 0 returns True.
    

    Alternatively, I think this is effectively a None check, so this can probably be if p_num is not None.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  3. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




brennie




   

   

  

 



 















 





 

  

   




david




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
david


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    Ship It!
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




brennie




   

   

  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 Review request changed

    
   


  

  

  






 

  Status:
  

  Closed (submitted)

  
 




 
Change Summary:

 
Pushed to release-1.0.x (cffad86)





 


 










  

 









     

    

   

  

  

   
   Loading...