Check for enabled features on local sites when on a global site

Review Request #9705 — Created Feb. 26, 2018 and submitted

Information

Review Board
release-3.0.x
87ac911...

Reviewers

When browsing a non-LocalSite specific page, if any LocalSite the user is
a member of has a feature enabled then it should be enabled for that
user while browsing the non-LocalSite page. Previously, this was not
taken into account and features that a user should otherwise have access
to would be disabled if they were enabled only for their LocalSites.
This has been corrected.

Ran unit tests.

Description From Last Updated

Typo in the description: "browing" -> "browsing"

chipx86chipx86

We can simplify this, reducing the code paths for checking a value and returning and code paths with: if local_site: …

chipx86chipx86

I don't like this returning None as an optional, and don't like not having an explicit return. This way leads …

chipx86chipx86

No trailing comma.

chipx86chipx86

E501 line too long (86 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

This would be better as: if getattr(request, 'local_site', None): ...

chipx86chipx86

These two if statements should be combined: if (local_site.extra_data and local_site.extra_data.get(...)):

chipx86chipx86

Extra space before "but".

chipx86chipx86
chipx86
  1. 
      
  2. reviewboard/features/checkers.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    We can simplify this, reducing the code paths for checking a value and returning and code paths with:

    if local_site:
        local_sites = [local_site]
    elif request is not None and request.user.is_authenticated():
        local_sites = request.user.local_site.all()
    else:
        local_sites = []
    
    for local_site in local_sites:
        if self._is_enabled_for_local_site(...):
            return True
    
    return False
    
  3. reviewboard/features/checkers.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    I don't like this returning None as an optional, and don't like not having an explicit return. This way leads to confusing problems down the road. This can easily return a boolean explicitly using basically what we had before:

    if local_site.extra_data:
        try:
            return local_site.extra_data[self.EXTRA_DATA_KEY][feature_id]
        except KeyError:
            pass
    
    return False
    
    1. Or:

      return (local_site.extra_data is not None and
              local_site.extra_data.get(self.EXTRA_DATA_KEY, {}).get(feature_id, False)
      
  4. reviewboard/features/tests.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    No trailing comma.

  5. 
      
brennie
Review request changed

Change Summary:

Addressed Christian's comments.

Commit:

-8d52386cace9a4b8fbe18b6b598b0a0f59bfa5d6
+665cbeb63e91ebd99879681f69000a58061b6990

Diff:

Revision 2 (+84 -26)

Show changes

Checks run (1 failed, 1 succeeded)

flake8 failed.
JSHint passed.

flake8

brennie
chipx86
  1. Ship It!

  2. 
      
brennie
chipx86
  1. 
      
  2. Show all issues

    Typo in the description: "browing" -> "browsing"

  3. reviewboard/features/checkers.py (Diff revision 4)
     
     
    Show all issues

    This would be better as:

    if getattr(request, 'local_site', None):
        ...
    
  4. reviewboard/features/checkers.py (Diff revision 4)
     
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    These two if statements should be combined:

    if (local_site.extra_data and
        local_site.extra_data.get(...)):
    
  5. reviewboard/webapi/tests/test_base.py (Diff revision 4)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Extra space before "but".

  6. 
      
brennie
david
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
      
brennie
Review request changed

Status: Closed (submitted)

Change Summary:

Pushed to release-3.0.x (74f5768)
Loading...