Add old status/public states to the review request reopened signal.

Review Request #8724 — Created Feb. 8, 2017 and submitted

Information

Review Board
release-2.5.x
0fef63a...

Reviewers

This fleshes out the review request reopened signals to include
information on what the status and public states were prior to
reopening. Consumers can use this to more intelligently determine
whether to take action on the reopen. For instance, it could decide not
to send a message to a service for a review request that was previously
unpublished and is now being reopened, or it could send a different
message when reopened from a discarded state vs. a submitted state.

Unit tests were added to test reopen functionality and resulting states,
including the new signal changes.

Unit tests pass.

reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/reviews/tests/test_review_request.py
        reviewboard/reviews/signals.py
        reviewboard/reviews/models/review_request.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/reviews/tests/test_review_request.py
        reviewboard/reviews/signals.py
        reviewboard/reviews/models/review_request.py
    
    
  2. 
      
MU
  1. 
      
  2. reviewboard/reviews/models/review_request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
     
     

    For reopening, status and public haven't changed yet, so they're the same as the old values.
    Would it perhaps make more sense to provide the new values in the signal so listeners could determine what will happen?

    1. I considered this, but intentionally left the values in for consistency and to make it easier to share code between handlers. For instance:

      def on_reopened(self, **kwargs):
          self.send_some_message('reopened', **kwargs)
      
      def on_reopening(self, **kwargs):
          self.send_some_message('reopening', **kwargs)
      
      def send_some_message(self, description, user, review_request, old_status, old_public):
          ...
      

      I originally included the new values as well. I got rid of them because the status is always going to be PENDING_REVIEW. However, maybe the public state makes sense (it only changes if coming from a discarded state, which can be inferred from the old status, but that requires knowledge of internals). And maybe if we're including that, the status would also make sense to include, even if it's always going to be a fixed value... Not sure yet.

  3. 
      
brennie
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
      
chipx86
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/reviews/tests/test_review_request.py
        reviewboard/reviews/signals.py
        reviewboard/reviews/models/review_request.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/reviews/tests/test_review_request.py
        reviewboard/reviews/signals.py
        reviewboard/reviews/models/review_request.py
    
    
  2. 
      
david
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
      
chipx86
Review request changed

Status: Closed (submitted)

Change Summary:

Pushed to release-2.5.x (afa77f2)
Loading...