Add a setting for all review bots to skip posting a review if there were no files processed.

Review Request #8192 — Created May 27, 2016 and discarded

Information

ReviewBot
release-0.2.x

Reviewers

Add a setting for all review tools to skip posting a review if there were no files processed. I'm not a big fan of the variable naming, it seems confusing, but I couldn't think of better ones. Suggestions are welcome.

I've been using this for a while locally and finally polished it up a bit for review.

I have just the PEP8 and pyflakes bots enabled.

  • Setting defaults to off
    • Posting a powershell file results in a review posted.
    • Posting a python file results in a review posted.
  • Turn setting on for both bots
    • Posting a powershell file results in silent bots (verified by logging).
    • Posting a python file results in a review posted.

  • Revision 2 is currently untested as I ran in to some issues with trying to manage the settings entries in the database through django. I may need some assistance if you'd like me to test it before submission *
Description From Last Updated

Also, you have a typo in your testing done: "pythong"

brenniebrennie

Can you clean up your testing done? We have support for lists via markdown, and Verifications really doesn't belong there.

brenniebrennie

This should be in __init__, as it is an attribute of the instance, not the class itself. These other attributes …

brenniebrennie

We don't really need this here. We can pull the setting out when checking it. Also, we should call this …

brenniebrennie

The try should be inside the if in this configuration.

brenniebrennie

Format as: if (not review.ignore_irrelevant or (review.ignore_irrelevant and review.relevant_review)): Also, this is logically equivalent to: not review.ignore_irrelevant or review.relevant_review

brenniebrennie

We use signgle quotes for all strings.

brenniebrennie

Single quotes for strings.

brenniebrennie

Remove this.

brenniebrennie

Blank line between these.

brenniebrennie

post_trivial.

brenniebrennie

post_trivial and it should default to True.

brenniebrennie

Single quotes.

brenniebrennie
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        bot/reviewbot/tasks.py
        extension/reviewbotext/evolutions/add_tool_relevant_review_setting.py
        bot/reviewbot/tools/__init__.py
        extension/reviewbotext/evolutions/__init__.py
        extension/reviewbotext/admin.py
        extension/reviewbotext/extension.py
        extension/reviewbotext/models.py
        bot/reviewbot/processing/review.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        bot/reviewbot/tasks.py
        extension/reviewbotext/evolutions/add_tool_relevant_review_setting.py
        bot/reviewbot/tools/__init__.py
        extension/reviewbotext/evolutions/__init__.py
        extension/reviewbotext/admin.py
        extension/reviewbotext/extension.py
        extension/reviewbotext/models.py
        bot/reviewbot/processing/review.py
    
    
  2. 
      
BD
brennie
  1. 
      
  2. Show all issues

    Can you clean up your testing done? We have support for lists via markdown, and Verifications really doesn't belong there.

    1. Weird, when I first tried it I couldn't get the lists to indent but it worked this time.

  3. bot/reviewbot/processing/review.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    This should be in __init__, as it is an attribute of the instance, not the class itself.

    These other attributes should also be moved into __init__ but that doesn't need to be done now.

    Also, can we use the term "trivial review" to refer a review with no processed files?

  4. bot/reviewbot/processing/review.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    We don't really need this here. We can pull the setting out when checking it.

    Also, we should call this post_empty_reviews.

    1. I called it post_trivial_reviews to match the trivial_review setting.

  5. bot/reviewbot/tasks.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    The try should be inside the if in this configuration.

  6. bot/reviewbot/tasks.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    Format as:

    if (not review.ignore_irrelevant or
        (review.ignore_irrelevant and review.relevant_review)):
    

    Also, this is logically equivalent to:

    not review.ignore_irrelevant or review.relevant_review
    
    1. Switched to:

      if (post_trivial_reviews or not review.trivial_review):
      
  7. bot/reviewbot/tasks.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    We use signgle quotes for all strings.

    1. Is that a new requirement? Literally every log statement in this file uses double quotes ....

      I'd switch them all but I don't want to conflate the review.

  8. bot/reviewbot/tasks.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Single quotes for strings.

    1. Same response as above.

  9. bot/reviewbot/tasks.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Remove this.

  10. bot/reviewbot/tools/__init__.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    Blank line between these.

  11. extension/reviewbotext/admin.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    post_trivial.

    1. Changed to post_trivial_reviews.

  12. extension/reviewbotext/extension.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    post_trivial and it should default to True.

  13. extension/reviewbotext/models.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Single quotes.

    1. Every other help_text entry in this file uses double quotes...

  14. 
      
brennie
  1. 
      
  2. Show all issues

    Also, you have a typo in your testing done: "pythong"

  3. 
      
BD
david
  1. I'm working on a major reboot of Review Bot which uses the new status updates feature, which will eliminate the need for this (since we'll have feedback that a tool was run without needing to create a review).

  2. 
      
david
Review request changed

Status: Discarded

Loading...