Fix error message when Python isn't properly configured to proxy server.

Review Request #7689 — Created Oct. 10, 2015 and discarded

Information

Review Board
master

Reviewers

Better handled 'URLError' error message by placing line 'data = e.read()' in try block instead of outside of it. This way, when there is a URLError exception, it will not raise an error with URLError calling read().

Tested by reloading browser (Chrome).

Ran ./reviewboard/manage.py test -- reviewboard.hostingsvcs.tests and all 167 tests passed.

Description From Last Updated

Should probably put this newline back

mike_conleymike_conley

'KilnClient' imported but unused

reviewbotreviewbot

Thanks for the test! This is fantastic. Is it possible to write a similar test for the GitHub hosting service?

mike_conleymike_conley

Please remove this line (so there's no blank line at the top of the function).

daviddavid

Please remove this line.

daviddavid

Here too.

daviddavid

Can you sort these in alphabetical order?

daviddavid

Should be "GitHub".

daviddavid

This isn't testing anything. You're never actually calling any of the functions. It's not even taking all the required arguments. …

chipx86chipx86

Same here.

chipx86chipx86

Col: 80 E501 line too long (97 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (101 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (110 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (114 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (84 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 9 E265 block comment should start with '# '

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 13 E116 unexpected indentation (comment)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 13 E265 block comment should start with '# '

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (97 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (101 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (110 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (114 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (84 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (88 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 9 E265 block comment should start with '# '

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 80 E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 13 E116 unexpected indentation (comment)

reviewbotreviewbot

Col: 13 E265 block comment should start with '# '

reviewbotreviewbot
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
    
    
  2. 
      
mike_conley
  1. I think there are still .read() usages in kiln.py as well - can we fix those too?

  2. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Should probably put this newline back

  3. 
      
CA
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
  2. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 2)
     
     
    Show all issues
     'KilnClient' imported but unused
    
  3. 
      
mike_conley
  1. 
      
  2. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 2)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Thanks for the test! This is fantastic. Is it possible to write a similar test for the GitHub hosting service?

  3. 
      
CA
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
  2. 
      
david
  1. Just a handful of trivial requests.

  2. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py (Diff revision 3)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Please remove this line (so there's no blank line at the top of the function).

  3. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py (Diff revision 3)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Please remove this line.

  4. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py (Diff revision 3)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Here too.

  5. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 3)
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    Can you sort these in alphabetical order?

  6. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 3)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Should be "GitHub".

  7. 
      
CA
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
  2. 
      
brennie
  1. The change description should be a more high level overview of the change instead of indicating what lines were moved where. Have a look at https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/writing-good-descriptions/

    Other than that, this change looks fine to me :)

  2. 
      
chipx86
  1. 
      
  2. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 4)
     
     
    Show all issues

    This isn't testing anything. You're never actually calling any of the functions. It's not even taking all the required arguments. That leads me to believe this wasn't actually tested.

    Make sure you trigger something that will raise the URLError. I want to see a working assertRaises, and an assertion that service.client.http_get was called.

  3. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 4)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Same here.

  4. 
      
CA
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
  2. 
      
CA
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    
  2. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (97 > 79 characters)
    
  3. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (101 > 79 characters)
    
  4. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (110 > 79 characters)
    
  5. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (114 > 79 characters)
    
  6. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (84 > 79 characters)
    
  7. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 9
     E265 block comment should start with '# '
    
  8. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
    
  9. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 13
     E116 unexpected indentation (comment)
    
  10. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 6)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 13
     E265 block comment should start with '# '
    
  11. 
      
CA
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    Ignored Files:
        docs/bugfix_wrapup.txt
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Processed Files:
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/kiln.py
        reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py
    
    Ignored Files:
        docs/bugfix_wrapup.txt
    
    
  2. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (97 > 79 characters)
    
  3. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/github.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (101 > 79 characters)
    
  4. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (110 > 79 characters)
    
  5. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (114 > 79 characters)
    
  6. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (84 > 79 characters)
    
  7. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (88 > 79 characters)
    
  8. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 9
     E265 block comment should start with '# '
    
  9. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 80
     E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
    
  10. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 13
     E116 unexpected indentation (comment)
    
  11. reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests.py (Diff revision 7)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Col: 13
     E265 block comment should start with '# '
    
  12. 
      
david
Review request changed

Status: Discarded

Loading...