Draft release notes for RBTools 0.6.3.

Review Request #6544 — Created Oct. 31, 2014 and submitted

Information

RBTools
release-0.6.x
8b7b6e7...

Reviewers

This contains all bugfixes that have been selected to go into 0.6.3.

 
Description From Last Updated

I think this will read better if it says what it does now instead of what it did before, like: …

chipx86chipx86

Should use :option:

chipx86chipx86

This reads a bit strangely, and also is too technical about the fix. I'd say something more like: "Credentials provided …

chipx86chipx86

"command line"

chipx86chipx86

ClearCase.

chipx86chipx86

ClearCase.

chipx86chipx86

I don't really know what this means, and if I don't, users won't. We should flesh this out.

chipx86chipx86

Perforce

chipx86chipx86

Perforce.

chipx86chipx86

Swap these.

chipx86chipx86

will you add a section for new features? rbt post clearcase: add UCM activity (bug 3179) and lbtype (bug 3174) …

DE delyn
reviewbot
  1. Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Ignored Files:
        docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst
        docs/releasenotes/index.rst
    
    
    
    Tool: Pyflakes
    Ignored Files:
        docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst
        docs/releasenotes/index.rst
    
    
  2. 
      
chipx86
  1. 
      
  2. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    I think this will read better if it says what it does now instead of what it did before, like:

    "If any fields specified on the command line have problems and the review request is created, rbt post will now inform you that the review request exists, and provide the URL."

  3. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Should use :option:

  4. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    This reads a bit strangely, and also is too technical about the fix.

    I'd say something more like:

    "Credentials provided on the command line are now used to authenticate to the server when passing a diff in on stdin."

  5. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    "command line"

  6. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    ClearCase.

  7. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    ClearCase.

  8. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    I don't really know what this means, and if I don't, users won't. We should flesh this out.

  9. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Perforce

  10. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues

    Perforce.

  11. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    Swap these.

  12. 
      
david
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Ignored Files:
        docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst
        docs/releasenotes/index.rst
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Ignored Files:
        docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst
        docs/releasenotes/index.rst
    
    
  2. 
      
DE
  1. 
      
  2. docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst (Diff revision 2)
     
     
     
    Show all issues

    will you add a section for new features?

    rbt post
    clearcase: add UCM activity (bug 3179) and lbtype (bug 3174) changeset support

    the other ones I've seen

    support of include/exclude file list using -I/-X

    use diffvalidation api

    PS: in review request #6500, I have made a mistake about issue number, it should have been 3174

    1. We actually made some changes to what we were intending to release. New features are now all on master, and will be released in an 0.7. 0.6.3 is only bug-fixes.

  3. 
      
chipx86
  1. Ship It!

  2. 
      
david
Review request changed

Status: Closed (submitted)

Change Summary:

Pushed to release-0.6.x (245623d)
Loading...