Draft release notes for RBTools 0.6.3.
Review Request #6544 — Created Oct. 31, 2014 and submitted
This contains all bugfixes that have been selected to go into 0.6.3.
Description | From | Last Updated |
---|---|---|
I think this will read better if it says what it does now instead of what it did before, like: … |
chipx86 | |
Should use :option: |
chipx86 | |
This reads a bit strangely, and also is too technical about the fix. I'd say something more like: "Credentials provided … |
chipx86 | |
"command line" |
chipx86 | |
ClearCase. |
chipx86 | |
ClearCase. |
chipx86 | |
I don't really know what this means, and if I don't, users won't. We should flesh this out. |
chipx86 | |
Perforce |
chipx86 | |
Perforce. |
chipx86 | |
Swap these. |
chipx86 | |
will you add a section for new features? rbt post clearcase: add UCM activity (bug 3179) and lbtype (bug 3174) … |
DE delyn |
-
-
I think this will read better if it says what it does now instead of what it did before, like:
"If any fields specified on the command line have problems and the review request is created, rbt post will now inform you that the review request exists, and provide the URL."
-
-
This reads a bit strangely, and also is too technical about the fix.
I'd say something more like:
"Credentials provided on the command line are now used to authenticate to the server when passing a diff in on stdin."
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tool: Pyflakes Ignored Files: docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst docs/releasenotes/index.rst Tool: PEP8 Style Checker Ignored Files: docs/releasenotes/0.6.3.rst docs/releasenotes/index.rst
-
-
will you add a section for new features?
rbt post
clearcase: add UCM activity (bug 3179) and lbtype (bug 3174) changeset supportthe other ones I've seen
support of include/exclude file list using -I/-X
use diffvalidation api
PS: in review request #6500, I have made a mistake about issue number, it should have been 3174