Fix setting the height of the review request box for long fields.

Review Request #6154 — Created July 28, 2014 and submitted

Information

Review Board
master
bd6ec5c...

Reviewers

The fixes to set the proper widths of the fields broke the heights.
It removed the defer() call and replaced it with a throttle(). The
defer() is important to the calculations, though, since we schedule a
layout resize after closing CodeMirror fields but before all layout has
settled.

This restores the original _scheduleResizeLayout() function and adds the
throttle there.

Tested adding a lot of text to the Description field and closing it. It no
longer resulted in the text fields overflowing out of the review request box.

Tested adding lots of text to the Branch field. Didn't see it cause any
overflow issues.

Resized the window. Didn't see any performance issues.

Description From Last Updated

This is kind of very wrong. The 100 should be an argument to _.throttle instead of _.defer, and you're missing …

daviddavid
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Ignored Files:
        reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Ignored Files:
        reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js
    
    
  2. 
      
david
  1. 
      
  2. Show all issues

    This is kind of very wrong. The 100 should be an argument to _.throttle instead of _.defer, and you're missing a period in this._checkResizeLayout. Are you sure you tested this?

    1. This was a very bad merge job on my part. I had this implemented in another change by doing this._scheduleResizeLayout = ... like it was before this change, and that was working and was correct. I then tried moving it out into its own function and removed the this._scheduleResizeLayout = ... line in this commit.

      The commit after re-introduced the line (I've been juggling some branches). That overrode the broken version in the prototype with a correct version of this. I was probably testing with that commit.

      I've now re-tested with just this commit directly off of master, and it's working.

  3. 
      
chipx86
reviewbot
  1. Tool: Pyflakes
    Ignored Files:
        reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js
    
    
    
    Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
    Ignored Files:
        reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js
    
    
  2. 
      
david
  1. Ship It!

  2. 
      
chipx86
Review request changed

Status: Closed (submitted)

Change Summary:

Pushed to release-2.0.x (5cb1681)
Loading...