• 
  
    
 
    
 
    

    



    
    
    
    
     
    




    
 
    

  
    



    
 

 

  

  

 

    


  
    





    
 
    



  

    
 
 
    
  
    Fix setting the height of the review request box for long fields.
    
 
    

    



 
    
 
    

  Review Request #6154
  —
  Created July 28, 2014 and submitted 

 
    


    




    




    




 
    
  
    
   Information

  
    



    
 
 
    
  chipx86
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  Review Board
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  master
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  bd6ec5c...
 
    

    



 
    



 
    
  
    
   Reviewers

  
    



    
 
 
    
  reviewboard
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  
 
    

    



 
    



    


    
 
    




  

    
 
 
    
  
    The fixes to set the proper widths of the fields broke the heights.
    
It removed the defer() call and replaced it with a throttle(). The
    
defer() is important to the calculations, though, since we schedule a
    
layout resize after closing CodeMirror fields but before all layout has
    
settled.
    

    This restores the original _scheduleResizeLayout() function and adds the
    
throttle there.
    
 
    

    





  

    
 
 
    
  
    Tested adding a lot of text to the Description field and closing it. It no
    
longer resulted in the text fields overflowing out of the review request box.
    

    Tested adding lots of text to the Branch field. Didn't see it cause any
    
overflow issues.
    

    Resized the window. Didn't see any performance issues.
    
 
    

    




 
    

    





    
 
    









 





    
 
 
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
      
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
    
    
   
    
   
    
    
     
    
      Description
      From
      Last Updated
     
    
        
    



     
    
      
       
       
    This is kind of very wrong. The 100 should be an argument to _.throttle instead of _.defer, and you're missing …
    
          		
      
       daviddavid
      
      
       
      
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

    




 
    

    



  
    
 
    

    


    


 













    
 





 
    
  
    
   
    



reviewbot




   
    
   
    



    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     
reviewbot


    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    


      




    1. 
 
      
  
      
   
      Tool: Pyflakes
Ignored Files:
    reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js



Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
Ignored Files:
    reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js


      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      2. 















    2. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      3. 


    

  
    
 
    

    












    
 





 
    
  
    
   
    



david




   
    
   
    





    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     
david


    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    


      




    1. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      2. 

















    2. 
 
      
  
  
      
  
 
      
  
      
   
      
    
     
      
      
       reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
      
          
    
     
       
      

     
       
      

     
       
      

     
       
      

          
   
      
  
      
 
      

   
      
    
    




      
 
      
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
      

      



    
      This is kind of very wrong. The 100 should be an argument to _.throttle instead of _.defer, and you're missing a period in this._checkResizeLayout. Are you sure you tested this?
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  


      1. 
 
 
        
 
        
  
 
        
 
        
  
        This was a very bad merge job on my part. I had this implemented in another change by doing this._scheduleResizeLayout = ... like it was before this change, and that was working and was correct. I then tried moving it out into its own function and removed the this._scheduleResizeLayout = ... line in this commit.
        

        The commit after re-introduced the line (I've been juggling some branches). That overrode the broken version in the prototype with a correct version of this. I was probably testing with that commit.
        

        I've now re-tested with just this commit directly off of master, and it's working.
        
 
        

        2. 


 
      


      

 
      

      3. 




    3. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      4. 


    

  
    
 
    

    












    
 



 
    
  
    
   
    



chipx86




   
    
   
    
  
    
 
    


 

    












    
 





 
    
  
    
   
    



reviewbot




   
    
   
    



    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     
reviewbot


    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    


      




    1. 
 
      
  
      
   
      Tool: Pyflakes
Ignored Files:
    reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js



Tool: PEP8 Style Checker
Ignored Files:
    reviewboard/static/rb/js/views/reviewRequestEditorView.js


      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      2. 















    2. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      3. 


    

  
    
 
    

    












    
 





 
    
  
    
   
    



david




   
    
   
    





    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     
david


    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    


      




    1. 
 
      
  
      
   
      Ship It!
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      2. 















    2. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      3. 


    

  
    
 
    

    












    
 



 
    
  
    
   
    



chipx86




   
    
   
    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     Review request changed
    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    




    

  
    
   
    
    Status:
   
    
   
    

    Completed

   
    
  
    



  
    
   
    
    Change Summary:
   
    
   
    
    
    Pushed to release-2.0.x (5cb1681)