Use more specific assertions for 'in' checks.

 






 

 


  Review Request #6064
  —
  Created July 4, 2014 and submitted  — Latest diff uploaded 

 


















 

  

   Information

  





 
 

  chipx86
 









 
 

  Review Board
 









 
 

  release-2.0.x
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  3797c0d...
 






 




 

  

   Reviewers

  





 
 

  reviewboard
 









 
 

  
 






 








 





  


 
 

  
A lot of old code used assertTrue(blah in blah), or variants on that,

which didn't tell you much if there was a failure. Nowadays, we have

assertIn and assertNotIn, which we can use instead. This switches our

tests to use these.

 








  


 
 

  
Unit tests pass.