-
-
-
-
This first sentence feels a bit awkward too. The interface doesn't just change when there are multiple revisions. Maybe just something like:
"The interface for choosing which diff revision or set of interdiff revisions to view has changed."
I don't think we need to mention the "multiple revisions of a diff," since our users who are reading release notes are probably familiar with that.
-
"review request" is used everywhere else, so we should use that instead of "Review Request."
Worth grepping to see if there are more occurrences.
-
I had to read this three times. We should simplify it, get straight to the heart of the problem:
"Interdiffs could become a mess after syncing a development tree and posting a new diff. They would show changes from the sync that were unrelated to the posted change.
The diff viewer will now do its best ..."
-
-
I read the "committed changes from .." at first as the source of the commits coming from some place. Maybe "of the committed changes, ordered from most recent to least." ?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
We may also want to use
:guilabel:
for all these. We have various places in the release notes where we're inconsistent here. We alternate between things likedescription
,Description
, and:guillabel:\
Description``. We should try to make these all consistent.In the past, I've tried to use
:guilabel:
for these (though I'm sure I've missed some on occasion). -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This is just one of many things that center around auth backends. We should give those their own section.
-
-
We should probably make the wording more consistent, since these are saying the same things but for two different types of objects.
-
-
-
-
-
-
I think this was just part of the whole new move detection stuff. I don't think we need this in bugs.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Add draft 2.0 release notes.
Review Request #5717 — Created April 16, 2014 and submitted
This has everything from the 2.0 beta 1, beta 2, beta 3, RC 1, and RC 2
releases, plus the changes that have gone in since RC 2, minus the changes and
bugfixes that have been backported to 1.7.x, and minus any fixes from later
prereleases for features introduced in earlier prereleases.
- Built HTML and read through it.
- Did some fancy-pants grepping to check for backported bugs.
Description | From | Last Updated |
---|---|---|
We should add the "patch by" to this too. |
chipx86 | |
Something's wrong with this sentence. |
chipx86 | |
This first sentence feels a bit awkward too. The interface doesn't just change when there are multiple revisions. Maybe just … |
chipx86 | |
"review request" is used everywhere else, so we should use that instead of "Review Request." Worth grepping to see if … |
chipx86 | |
I had to read this three times. We should simplify it, get straight to the heart of the problem: "Interdiffs … |
chipx86 | |
Why the extra spaces after the *? |
chipx86 | |
I read the "committed changes from .." at first as the source of the commits coming from some place. Maybe … |
chipx86 | |
"review request" |
chipx86 | |
Maybe "formatting" instead of "rich features"? |
chipx86 | |
Would be nice to link to these features. |
chipx86 | |
Let's link to the user manual page for this. |
chipx86 | |
"of the text" ? |
chipx86 | |
We should probably use :guilabel: for Review and New Comment. |
chipx86 | |
We may also want to use :guilabel: for all these. We have various places in the release notes where we're … |
chipx86 | |
:guilabel: for Show Changes |
chipx86 | |
Missing period. |
chipx86 | |
:guilabel: here too? |
chipx86 | |
"pencil" |
chipx86 | |
This is a big enough one where it should probably get its own section. |
chipx86 | |
:guilabel: for "System Information"? |
chipx86 | |
:guilabel: |
chipx86 | |
:guilabel:? |
chipx86 | |
Does this wrapped link work? I thought there were issues with that. |
chipx86 | |
Same question about these wrapped links. |
chipx86 | |
Too many blank lines. |
chipx86 | |
We shouldn't need this section. |
chipx86 | |
Let's move the "Patch by ..." to a next paragraph. |
chipx86 | |
Should put `\`` aroundissue_opened`. |
chipx86 | |
Should also put the quotes around open and null. |
chipx86 | |
Too many blank lines. |
chipx86 | |
Too many blank lines. |
chipx86 | |
We should link to the proper place. "See below" doesn't apply anymore. |
chipx86 | |
This is a big enough one where we should probably just give it its own section under Extensions. |
chipx86 | |
This is just one of many things that center around auth backends. We should give those their own section. |
chipx86 | |
"JavaScript" |
chipx86 | |
We should probably make the wording more consistent, since these are saying the same things but for two different types … |
chipx86 | |
I think these should always be the first section. |
chipx86 | |
Didn't we fix this in a 1.7.x? |
chipx86 | |
We should link to the 1.6 docs now. |
chipx86 | |
This should probably be after New Features, I think? |
chipx86 | |
This should be removed. |
chipx86 | |
I think this was just part of the whole new move detection stuff. I don't think we need this in … |
chipx86 | |
This was part of the new move detection stuff. This can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
This was part of the new interdiff code. This can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
Also part of the new interdiff code. Can also be removed. |
chipx86 | |
Part of the new move detection code. Can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
Can also be removed. |
chipx86 | |
I think this is covered by the "New Feature" entry. |
chipx86 | |
These are all things that were introduced in 2.0. We can remove these as well. |
chipx86 | |
2.0 betas. This can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
Introduced in 2.0. This can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
I think this was a regression in the new JS code. I think we can remove this. |
chipx86 | |
Introduced in 2.0. Can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
All stuff from 2.0. These can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
All bugs introduced in 2.0. These can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
This was a regression with the new My Account page. This can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
This is in 1.7.23. We can remove this. |
chipx86 | |
Wasn't this fixed in a 1.7.x? |
chipx86 | |
Introduced in 2.0. Can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
Introduced in 2.0. Can be removed. |
chipx86 | |
Regression in 2.0, from the Django upgrade. Can be removed. |
chipx86 |
- Commit:
-
ba3e87f0cba9e7aacd0b7bc4f1ac09c7fda55dd5482af8c8c814921356780d0697fe35f034014246
- Diff:
-
Revision 2 (+1790)