-
-
docs/manual/extending/extensions/hooks.txt (Diff revision 1) Can you add something to this that says that the fieldset ID is used when defining the individual fields?
Add support for custom fields in extensions.
Review Request #5206 — Created Jan. 7, 2014 and submitted
Add support for custom fields in extensions.
This introduces two new hooks:
ReviewRequestFieldSetsHook
and
ReviewRequestFieldsHook
.
ReviewRequestFieldSetsHook
allows for the creation of fieldsets, or
sectioned groups of fields on the side of a review request.
ReviewRequestFieldsHook
allows for the creation of custom fields in any
fieldset. These fields are stored along with a draft and their history is
tracked in the change descriptions. All fields are also accessible/mutable
through the API by making use of theextra_data
support.Currently, all built-in fields are text-based, but a future change will
allow for more types of fields.
Wrote an extension that made use of different fields, and tested them.
Description | From | Last Updated |
---|---|---|
Can you add something to this that says that the fieldset ID is used when defining the individual fields? |
david |
Change Summary:
Added a blurb about how fieldset IDs are used.