Checks run (2 succeeded)
flake8
passed.
JSHint
passed.
Add docs on the Document Review settings page.
Review Request #15073 — Created May 22, 2026 and submitted
This adds a small docs page covering the new Document Review settings
page in the admin UI sidebar. It briefly discusses the feature and
broker URL settings, and includes information on the broker status, with
a screenshot.It's the first page to include an admonition stating that this is a
feature in Review Board Plus and Enterprise. We'll want to standardize
on language and appearance for these notices going forward.
Built the docs (along with a temporary intersphinx rule pointing to
Power Pack, which is in the User Roles change). Tested that links worked.Tested the screenshots.
Checked for spelling issues.
| Summary | ID |
|---|---|
| 6d325c43c3b45da0ca8a82ae1d646f63fcb65e3b |
| Description | From | Last Updated |
|---|---|---|
|
Given that we know we want to have this be standard, can we put it into a file in docs/manual/_shared/ … |
david
|
|
|
Can we add a _... label for this, in case we want to link to it later? |
david
|
|
|
We don't currently have powerpack in our intersphinx config. |
david
|
|
|
Can we add a _... label for this, in case we want to link to it later? |
david
|
-
-
Given that we know we want to have this be standard, can we put it into a file in
docs/manual/_shared/and use.. include::?We probably should also not have a period on the admonition title to match other ones in the manual.
Even better would be a small extension that we could use like
.. rb-feature-availability:: plus, enterprisein order to have flexibility for when we have features that are enterprise-only, but that's more work. Perhaps an include for now with a comment in there about generalizing it? -
-
-
