The lines in the description are too long (need to be less than 79 chars).

This doesn't seem like it should always be True, we should be grabbing the saved value from the user's profile. You can get the user's profile by doing request.user.get_profile() and then grab the publish_and_archive setting from the profile.
Also, since we access request.user multiple times in this function, its a good idea to pull this out into a variable (user = request.user) and replace any instances of request.user with this new user variable. Calling the variable is less expensive than accessing the user property on the request.

Add a blank line after this one.

I think the spacing here should stay the way it was before.

The spacing here should stay the way it was before.

The spacing here should stay the way it was before.

The spacing here should stay the way it was before. Theres a few other instances of this in this file, they can all be changed back to the way it was before.

Missing a trailing colon.

Add a blank line after this one.

This is generally looking pretty good. There are a bunch of unrelated formatting changes that slipped in which do not conform to our coding style, which seems like maybe your editor is trying to do some auto-formatting.

Since you're not longer adding anything to here, let's revert these particular changes. Sorting this alphabetically is something that's still valuable, but it doesn't belong in this change anymore.

We need a "Version Added" here, even if it's still labeled as TODO

Add a blank line in between here.

Move this up to be just below the @beanbag/spina import.

Unindent this 4 spaces.

Let's type this as EventsHash. You can import that as type EventsHash inside the @beanbag/spina block.

We can remove the type for this. If _getReviewRequestEditor is properly typed, it'll be inferred.

Having "show" in the names for these doesn't make sense.

We don't need the let definition above and can just define this as const here.

This needs a doc comment.

This should be typed as returning ReviewRequestEditor. You can import that as:

import {
    type ReviewRequestEditor,
} from '../models/reviewRequestEditorModel';

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

Can we call this ReviewDialogPublishButtonView? Explicit is generally better, even when it feels verbose.

We should also change the typing here for ReviewRequestEditor

The formatting changes here aren't wrong, but it's just code movement for no reason. Please undo this.

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

Looks like some automatic formatting messed this up.

If we keep options optional in _saveReview then we don't need this change.

If we keep options optional in _saveReview then we don't need this change.

Let's keep the options structure optional here.

No blank line here.

Please add types for these.

No blank line here.

No blank line here.

No blank line here.

Add another blank line here.

Can we call this BannerPublishButtonView?

Undo this formatting change.

Undo this formatting change.

Undo this formatting change.

Undo this formatting change.

Undo this formatting change.

This needs to be defined in the ReviewRequestEditorAttrs interface too.

Leftover debug code.

This can just be "Return the review request editor."

This can probably just say "Trigger the publish operation."

These should start with lower case letters.

Because it spans multiple lines, let's wrap the whole value in parens:

trivial: (sendEmailItem !== null &&
          !sendEmailItem.get('checked'))

If we change the publish button to specify the model as ReviewRequestEditor I think this doesn't need to be imported anymore.

This should use PublishButtonView<ReviewRequestEditor>

Let's just say "Return the review request editor."

Change this to say ReviewRequestEditor.

Same here with parens.

Please undo this change.

Please undo this change (you removed two spaces of indentation on this line).

What's left to do for these commented-out lines?

We sort alphabetically based on filename, so this should go just above the import of type ReviewRequestEditorView.

This needs a doc comment.

Ping on this TODO

We should add some extra info to the description to let people know this needs to be implemented by the subclass:
/**
 * Update the state of the publish button.
 *
 * This should be implemented by subclasses.
 */

Nit: Use "Return" instead of "Returns".

Nit: Use "Call" instead of "Calls".

While you're here, can you update the docs to include an "Option Args" section. You can see examples if you search for "Option Args" in the codebase.

To be more specific about what differentiates this test from the previous one and what the purpose is, you could say "should trigger the publish event handler when publishAndArchive is false". And above you can say "should trigger the publish event handler when publishAndArchive is true"

This can stay at the indentation level that it was at before.

Please add some screenshots of the frontend.

We have inconsistent casing here. This should probably be "Archive after publishing"

There's an extra space at the end of this line.

This should say it returns RB.ReviewRequestEditor. Also needs a colon.

This is missing publishAndArchiveItem, and showSendEmailItem should be sendEmailItem

Needs a trailing comma.

Should be 8.0

These need to be updated to match the code.

These are kinda malformed (missing the "trivial" label, blank lines, indendation, and typo in "archive")

"trivial" means "don't send any email", which is different from "publish to owner only". We've lost some functionality here.

Something weird happened here, seems like maybe some lines got lost?