flake8
passed.
JSHint
passed.
Update docs for Power Pack's new document review.
Review Request #13450 — Created Dec. 6, 2023 and updated
This updates our docs for Power Pack's new document review. This mostly just
removes references to "PDF document review" and adds a plug for Power Pack's
enhanced document in our docs for reviewing file attachments.
Built the docs and tested that the newly added links will work.
| Summary | ID |
|---|---|
| a49168d37500c97eda31332e2c55d1a660c7dcc0 |
| Description | From | Last Updated |
|---|---|---|
|
I wonder if we want to advertise this as "Office and PDF document review". "Office" being something worth being clear … |
 chipx86
|
|
|
I'd like to break this up a bit. Power Pack should get its own paragraph, and we should call out … |
chipx86
|
|
|
For reference definitions, the backticks aren't needed. |
chipx86
|
-
-
README.rst (Diff revision 1) I wonder if we want to advertise this as "Office and PDF document review". "Office" being something worth being clear on.
If so, then this applies elsewhere as well.
-
docs/manual/users/reviews/reviewing-files.rst (Diff revision 1) I'd like to break this up a bit.
Power Pack should get its own paragraph, and we should call out the document types that are supported. I think this might be best as a "tip" admonition, using bullet points to list out:
- Microsoft Office documents (Word, PowerPoint, Excel)
- LibreOffice/OpenOffice documents
- PDF documents
And then a Learn More link.
This will help draw the eyes to it, and help with search indexing.
The extension blurb should also be a separate paragraph.
-
docs/manual/users/reviews/reviewing-files.rst (Diff revision 1) For reference definitions, the backticks aren't needed.