Port RB.Review to TS/spina

 






 

 


  Review Request #13169
  —
  Created Aug. 1, 2023 and submitted 

 




















 

  

   Information

  





 
 

  david
 









 
 

  Review Board
 









 
 

  release-6.x
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  
 






 




 

  

   Reviewers

  





 
 

  reviewboard
 









 
 

  
 






 








 





  


 
 

  
This change ports the Review model to TypeScript and spina.

 








  


 
 

  
Ran unit tests.

 







 









 





  

 


 
 

  



 

  
   


    Summary
    ID

   

  
  

   


    

     

      Port RB.Review to TS/spina
      
This change ports the Review model to TypeScript and spina.

Testing Done:
Ran unit tests.

     


    		
    366dd8c99365bb495a15c577fcc00b3d39565757

   



  
 




 













 






 
 
 

  

   

    

     
    

    
    
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
    

   

   

    
     

      Description
      From
      Last Updated
     

    
    



     

      
       
       
Missing docs.

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
Since these prototypeAttrs are already set on BaseResource, I thought we didn't have to include this here because they get …

      		
      
       maubinmaubin
      
      
       
      
     


    

 There are no open issues


   

  

 







 






  

 



















 




 




 














 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86



    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/static/rb/js/common/resources/models/reviewModel.ts
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    Missing docs.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      So I'm a little conflicted here. I feel like it's useful to have this interface for type checking of parse methods, but it's not part of the API surface of the model. The items here also are completely duplicated by our webapi documentation and overlap almost 100% with the docs for the model attributes.
      
 
      

      2. 



    2. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      Yeah, I get those arguments for sure. I guess given that these are API data (which I wasn't really thinking about when I wrote this), we can make an exception.
      
 
      

      3. 


 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  3. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  

 
















 





 

  

   




maubin




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
maubin



    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/static/rb/js/common/resources/models/reviewModel.ts
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    Since these prototypeAttrs are already set on BaseResource, I thought we didn't have to include this here because they get inherited?
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      They're supposed to, but David's noticed a bug in Spina preventing this from working. I haven't worked it out yet.
      
 
      

      2. 



    2. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      Oh got it.
      
 
      

      3. 


 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  3. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  

 
















 





 

  

   




maubin




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
maubin



    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    Ship It!
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




david




   

   

  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 Review request changed

    
   


  

  

  







  

   

    Status:
   

   


    Completed

   

  




  

   

    Change Summary:
   

   

    
Pushed to release-6.x (15e9e30)

   

  















  

 









     

    

   

  

  

   
   Loading...