Improve the JavaScript extensions docs.

Review Request #13018 — Created May 9, 2023 and submitted

Information

Review Board
release-6.x

Reviewers

This improves the JavaScript extensions docs, mostly by modernizing the
JavaScript code in the examples and fixing up some typos.

Built the docs.

Summary ID
Improve the JavaScript extensions docs.
e043fe58c0f46653fc56a23d762e083879d34e6e
Description From Last Updated

To keep this is internal to the module, we'll want to use const here. This applies to the other examples …

chipx86chipx86

These won't be modified, so we should use const. Also, to comply with our modern JavaScript styling, we should have …

chipx86chipx86

The old wording was incorrect. This isn't related to the Comment Dialog, but rather comment fields within the Review Dialog.

chipx86chipx86

Same note as above.

chipx86chipx86
chipx86
  1. Thanks for modernizing this!

  2. To keep this is internal to the module, we'll want to use const here.

    This applies to the other examples as well.

  3. These won't be modified, so we should use const. Also, to comply with our modern JavaScript styling, we should have one const/let per variable.

  4. The old wording was incorrect. This isn't related to the Comment Dialog, but rather comment fields within the Review Dialog.

  5. 
      
maubin
david
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
      
maubin
Review request changed

Status: Closed (submitted)

Change Summary:

Pushed to release-6.x (fc234a2)
Loading...