Split up reviews/views.py

Review Request #12684 — Created Oct. 14, 2022 and submitted

Information

Review Board
release-6.x

Reviewers

The main reviews/views.py file was pretty huge, and was very difficult
to navigate. This change splits it up into a bunch of smaller files.

There are a couple trivial changes (adding some asserts, defining a
name attribute on BugTracker) in order to make type checkers a
bit happier, but otherwise this is purely moving things around.

Ran unit tests.

Summary ID
Split up reviews/views.py
The main reviews/views.py file was pretty huge, and was very difficult to navigate. This change splits it up into a bunch of smaller files. There are a couple trivial changes (adding some asserts, defining a `name` attribute on `BugTracker`) in order to make type checkers a bit happier, but otherwise this is purely moving things around. Testing Done: Ran unit tests.
bf41aad340ac3bb2ab1ccb79f69a1fa8b814200c
Description From Last Updated

Nice cleanup. Do we want to add these individual modules to the Python docs, or just keep the existing views.py? …

chipx86chipx86

too many blank lines (3) Column: 1 Error code: E303

reviewbotreviewbot

blank line at end of file Column: 1 Error code: W391

reviewbotreviewbot

line too long (83 > 79 characters) Column: 80 Error code: E501

reviewbotreviewbot
Checks run (1 failed, 1 succeeded)
flake8 failed.
JSHint passed.

flake8

david
Review request changed

Commits:

Summary ID
Split up reviews/views.py
The main reviews/views.py file was pretty huge, and was very difficult to navigate. This change splits it up into a bunch of smaller files. There are a couple trivial changes (adding some asserts, etc) in order to make type checkers a bit more happy, but otherwise this is purely moving things around. Testing Done: Ran unit tests.
b853e24db14702cc0266e0eba4b6a01119eb1a7c
Split up reviews/views.py
The main reviews/views.py file was pretty huge, and was very difficult to navigate. This change splits it up into a bunch of smaller files. There are a couple trivial changes (adding some asserts, defining a `name` attribute on `BugTracker`) in order to make type checkers a bit happier, but otherwise this is purely moving things around. Testing Done: Ran unit tests.
8ff2c48a93239f260898c7e5ecf5982d4b3e73d6

Diff:

Revision 2 (+5304 -4950)

Show changes

Checks run (1 failed, 1 succeeded)

flake8 failed.
JSHint passed.

flake8

david
maubin
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
      
chipx86
  1. 
      
  2. Show all issues

    Nice cleanup.

    Do we want to add these individual modules to the Python docs, or just keep the existing views.py? Probably the former.

    If the former, then the views.py needs to do __autodoc_excludes__ = __all__ or it'll end up duplicating definitions for all these.

  3. 
      
david
maubin
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
      
chipx86
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
      
david
Review request changed

Status: Closed (submitted)

Change Summary:

Pushed to release-6.x (8612482)
Loading...