Finish transitioning to named loggers in Review Board.

Review Request #12680 — Created Oct. 11, 2022 and submitted — Latest diff uploaded

Information

Review Board
release-6.x

Reviewers

In order to have better context for log messages, we've been moving
things over to use named loggers instead of just relying on the methods
in the logging module. This change finishes up that transition for the
Review Board codebase.

Ran unit tests.

Diff Revision 1

This is not the most recent revision of the diff. The latest diff is revision 2. See what's changed.

orig
1
2

Commits

First Last Summary ID Author
Finish transitioning to named loggers in Review Board.
In order to have better context for log messages, we've been moving things over to use named loggers instead of just relying on the methods in the `logging` module. This change finishes up that transition for the Review Board codebase. Testing Done: Ran unit tests.
a90b811338c97fabf2ca8826066f2326ffba2b57 David Trowbridge
reviewboard/attachments/mimetypes.py
reviewboard/attachments/models.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/beanstalk.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/bitbucket.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/bugzilla.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/codebasehq.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/forms.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/gitlab.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/hook_utils.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/jira.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/rbgateway.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/splat.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests/test_bitbucket.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests/test_github.py
reviewboard/hostingsvcs/tests/test_rbgateway.py
reviewboard/reviews/managers.py
reviewboard/scmtools/signal_handlers.py
Loading...