• 
      

    Allow diff generation to specify extra_data for a review request.

    Review Request #12253 — Created April 22, 2022 and submitted

    Information

    RBTools
    release-3.x

    Reviewers

    SCMClient.diff() can now return a review_request_extra_data
    dictionary containing state to store on the review request's
    extra_data.

    If posting a brand-new review request, this will be stored directly on
    the review request. If updating an existing one, this will be stored on
    the draft.

    This can be useful for storing metadata that should show up in fields on
    a review request, or for providing metadata that can be used for
    enhanced matching of review requests when using rbt post -u (a
    feature coming for RBTools 3.1 in an upcoming change).

    The data will be sent to Review Board through a JSON Merge Patch.

    Unit tests pass for all supported versions of Python.

    Modified the Git diff output to include some nested metadata and posted
    locally. Verified the results in the posted review request, and then in the
    draft.

    Tested an earlier version of this with the SOS work, verifying that the data
    got into the review request and was displayed in the custom fields.

    Summary ID
    Allow diff generation to specify extra_data for a review request.
    `SCMClient.diff()` can now return a `review_request_extra_data` dictionary containing state to store on the review request's ``extra_data``. If posting a brand-new review request, this will be stored directly on the review request. If updating an existing one, this will be stored on the draft. This can be useful for storing metadata that should show up in fields on a review request, or for providing metadata that can be used for enhanced matching of review requests when using `rbt post -u` (a feature coming for RBTools 3.1 in an upcoming change). The data will be sent to Review Board through a JSON Merge Patch.
    2d14cb2c946112491af8c936da2aa9074ee2c371
    Description From Last Updated

    F401 'json' imported but unused

    reviewbotreviewbot

    E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)

    reviewbotreviewbot

    This is big. Can we reformat with one parameter per line?

    daviddavid

    Can we reformat with one parameter per line?

    daviddavid
    Checks run (1 failed, 1 succeeded)
    flake8 failed.
    JSHint passed.

    flake8

    chipx86
    david
    1. 
        
    2. rbtools/commands/tests/test_post.py (Diff revision 2)
       
       
       
       
      Show all issues

      This is big. Can we reformat with one parameter per line?

    3. rbtools/commands/tests/test_post.py (Diff revision 2)
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Show all issues

      Can we reformat with one parameter per line?

    4. 
        
    chipx86
    david
    1. Ship It!
    2. 
        
    chipx86
    Review request changed
    Status:
    Completed
    Change Summary:
    Pushed to release-3.x (e688ce0)