Create RB.Admin.PageView and update existing admin views to extend it

 






 

 


  Review Request #10978
  —
  Created March 27, 2020 and submitted 

 


















 

  

   Information

  





 
 

  hxqlin
 









 
 

  Review Board
 









 
 

  master
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  10873
 









 
 

  4a1431f...
 






 




 

  

   Reviewers

  





 
 

  reviewboard
 









 
 

  
 






 








 





  


 
 

  
This review request creates RB.Admin.PageView, a new base page view that is 

specific to admin views. Existing views in reviewboard/static/rb/js/admin/views 

that don't extend from a specific view are updated to extend RB.Admin.PageView. 

They also call the parent view's initialize and renderPage as needed. This 

change will help with the implementation of the admin setup banner, which needs

to be displayed on all admin pages.

 








  


 
 

  
Existing unit tests all pass and a manual inspection of admin pages shows that

pages still render correctly.

 







 









 





  








 






 
 
 

  

   

    

     
    

    
    
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
    

   

   

    
     

      Description
      From
      Last Updated
     

    
    



     

      
       
       
Similar to David's comment, this isn't a page view, so it shouldn't inherit from RB.Admin.PageView. You can completely revert this …

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
I don't think this change is correct. There should be only one PageView object for the entire page, but this …

      		
      
       daviddavid
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
There's an extra line here.

      		
      
       daviddavid
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
Unlike render(), renderPage() doesn't return anything. So the function would be empty, just like RB.PageView's. As such, it's probably best …

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
This is still incorrectly inheriting from PageView. We should revert all the changes in this file.

      		
      
       daviddavid
      
      
       
      
     


    
   

  

 







 






  

 



















 




 




 














 





 

  

   




david




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
david


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    I don't think this change is correct. There should be only one PageView object for the entire page, but this is a sub-view that's instantiated (multiple times) by ChangeFormPageView.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 






  3. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    There's an extra line here.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  4. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    5. 




  

 
















 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    Similar to David's comment, this isn't a page view, so it shouldn't inherit from RB.Admin.PageView. You can completely revert this file.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 






  3. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
      reviewboard/static/rb/js/admin/views/pageView.es6.js
      


       (Diff revision 1)


      
     
    
    
       
   
    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

       
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    Unlike render(), renderPage() doesn't return anything. So the function would be empty, just like RB.PageView's.
    

    As such, it's probably best we just leave this out entirely in this change. There's no value to having renderPage() be here, since a parent class calling RB.Admin.PageView.protoype.renderPage() will end up calling the base RB.PageView.prototype.renderPage().
    

    This function can be defined and implemented when a future change needs to do so.
    

    So really, the code for this view should probably just be:
    

    

    RB.Admin.PageView = RB.PageView.extend({
});

    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  4. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    5. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




hxqlin




   

   

  

 



 















 





 

  

   




david




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
david


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    This is still incorrectly inheriting from PageView. We should revert all the changes in this file.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      Woops, I misread and thought both your and Christian's comment was referring to the same file.
      
 
      

      2. 


 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  3. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




hxqlin




   

   

  

 



 















 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    Ship It!
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




hxqlin




   

   

  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 Review request changed

    
   


  

  

  






 

  Status:
  

  Closed (submitted)

  
 




 
Change Summary:

 
Pushed to release-4.0.x (0ebfa48)





 


 










  

 









     

    

   

  

  

   
   Loading...