Add docs on developing against Review Board and maintaining forks

 






 

 


  Review Request #1014
  —
  Created Sept. 1, 2009 and submitted

 


















 

  

   Information

  





 
 

  chipx86
 









 
 

  Review Board
 









 
 

  master
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  
 






 




 

  

   Reviewers

  





 
 

  reviewboard
 









 
 

  
 






 








 





  


 
 

  
This is a new batch of docs that detail how to begin working on contributing to Review Board. It explains how to set up a development tree, the basics of branches, and contributing changes back.

There's also some docs in there for maintaining a fork of Review Board using GitHub or a custom solution.

 








  


 
 

  
Built the docs and read through them a bit.

 







 









 





  








 









 






  

 








 














 





 

  

   




david




   

   





  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
david


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
      docs/codebase/custom-forks.txt
      


       (Diff revision 1)


      
     
    
    
       
   
    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

       
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    





    
    I don't think people need to create a server (that's only if they want to serve it to people), they just need a clone. It's perfectly valid to do a clone straight from the reviewboard public clone URL, commit some changes locally, then periodically fetch and merge/rebase to stay current with upstream. I'd argue that's maybe even the way most people maintaining a private fork for their organization would do it.

Also, our->your.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      This isn't really about just maintaining a one-off developer checkout. This is about maintaining an actual fork of Review Board inside a company that other developers can access an contribute to.
      
 
      

      2. 



    2. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      Okay, in that case, can you make that clear? I think that in most cases for small teams, there will be a dude that maintains the reviewboard server and has their checkout with a couple small changes, and setting up a server for git collaboration isn't really appropriate for that.
      
 
      

      3. 


 
    


    

 
    

    3. 






  3. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
      docs/codebase/getting-started.txt
      


       (Diff revision 1)


      
     
    
    
       
   
    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

       
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    





    
    Two comments here.

I'd change "You should also use a..." to "Some people find it helpful to use a..."

gitx -> gitk
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  4. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    5. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




chipx86




   

   

  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 Review request changed

    
   


  

  

  








 
Change Summary:

 
* Make it more clear why you'd use a custom fork in a centralized place.
* Fix a case where "gitx" was referenced instead of "gitk."
* Make it sound less like a requirement to use gitk/gitx.





 



  

   
Diff:

   
    
 Revision 2 (+495)
Show changes
 
    docs/codebase/custom-forks.txt 
    docs/codebase/getting-started.txt 
    docs/codebase/index.txt 
 

   		
  



 










  

 
















 





 

  

   




david




   

   





  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
david


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
      docs/codebase/custom-forks.txt
      


       (Diff revision 2)


      
     
    
    
       
   
    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

    
     
    

       
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    





    
    Leftovers?
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      Fixed, and committing. I can make any additional changes if you spotted anything else.
      
 
      

      2. 


 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  3. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  

 









     

    

   

  

  

   
   Loading...