flake8
passed.
JSHint
passed.
Add ability to use config name as summary
Review Request #10105 — Created July 27, 2018 and updated
Add ability to use config name as summary.
If more than one reviewbot configuration using the same tool has its conditions satisfied for a review request, multiple status updates will exist on the review request using the same summary. This can be confusing for users, and makes debugging issues more difficult (which configuration caused the issue?).
This change adds an additional toggle underneath each configuration's "TOOL OPTIONS" to specify if the status update should use the configuration name as the summary (instead of the tool name).
An example of client usage which would motivate using the configuration name might be 2 different buildbot configurations that use different builders or branches.
Created a few configurations, some of which used config name and some of which didn't. Noticed config name was used for the ones where the option was checked.
-
-
Can you elaborate on the purpose of the change in the description? It's not entirely clear from reading it what this change is providing.
We have examples of how we like to see these structured (along with line length limits) here:
https://www.notion.so/Writing-Good-Change-Descriptions-10529e7c207743fa8ca90153d4b21fea
Change Summary:
Updated description
Description: |
|
|---|
-
-
I've been thinking about this, and I'm not sure I like the particular UI here. It requires the user to think a little too hard.
Can we instead add a new field for this, separate from the config name? If empty, it would default to the tool name, and if present, use that. This way the config name can continue to be an internal reference for the admins, and if someone chooses to set it they only need to put text in the field.