New python API

Review Request #2508 — Created Aug. 3, 2011 and discarded

Information

RBTools

Reviewers

New API is designed to provide simple and efficient access to RB resources, it employs 'factory' pattern and code generation to parse resource JSON structure and make pythons objects on the top of it. The code posted here is not complete as it turned out that heavy changes that mostly have subjects to change are hard to review and redo.

Related discussion is here:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/reviewboard-dev/HFm7rz4QE2k/discussion

For a while there are no tests, so you can run this code
to ensure that the new API works:

from textwrap import wrap

from rbtools.api.server import RBServer
from rbtools.api.settings import Settings


server = RBServer('http://reviews.reviewboard.org/')
root = server.get_root()

width = 80
review_requests = root.get_review_requests()
for rr in review_requests:
    print '\n', (' ' + rr.summary + ' ').center(width, '='), '\n'
    for line in wrap(rr.description, width):
        print line


Corresponding branch is at http://github.com/mbait/rbtools/tree/resources

 
Description From Last Updated

This should be automatically provided by Exception. Also, self.message is deprecated in 2.6, so we wouldn't want to use it …

chipx86chipx86

First line in the docs must be one line only. It should be a brief summary. Same with all other …

chipx86chipx86

Not needed.

chipx86chipx86

Two blank lines between these.

chipx86chipx86

Two blank lines between these.

chipx86chipx86

Wouldn't -1 just cause us to return the wrong error? Since it'd get the last entry in the array. I …

chipx86chipx86

You can do this without the inspect module: for name, value in locals(): if value != RequestError and issubclass(value, RequestError): …

chipx86chipx86

Still would rather not have FETCH_RQUEST_METHOD.

chipx86chipx86

"Contains" and "requests"

chipx86chipx86

One line.

chipx86chipx86

"High"

chipx86chipx86

Should use parens instead of \

chipx86chipx86

All this should probably be put in another branch somewhere, instead of in here. Or it should just be added. …

chipx86chipx86

Same with all these.

chipx86chipx86

This function should be returning something, or it shouldn't be provided at all yet.

chipx86chipx86

Blank line between these.

chipx86chipx86

Blank line between these.

chipx86chipx86

This can all probably be: setattr(resource, '__iter__', lambda: [i for i in lst])

chipx86chipx86

The parameter should only be indented 4 spaces.

chipx86chipx86

Swap these. variable == value

chipx86chipx86

_iteritems The __ would cause the name to be mangled, making debugging harder.

chipx86chipx86

return [i for i in self._iteritems]

chipx86chipx86

How does this work asynchronously? There's no callback.

chipx86chipx86

Capital D.

chipx86chipx86

Should subclass object.

chipx86chipx86
MB
chipx86
  1. Lots of little stylistic and doc stuff. I'll probably want to take another look at the implementation. Can you provide the link on github to the latest version you have of resources.py so I can see it without the delete/replace lines?
    
    Also, I prefer errors.py, as it's what we use through both Review Board and Djblets.
  2. rbtools/api/error.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    This should be automatically provided by Exception.
    
    Also, self.message is deprecated in 2.6, so we wouldn't want to use it anyway.
  3. rbtools/api/error.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    First line in the docs must be one line only. It should be a brief summary.
    
    Same with all other docstrings.
  4. rbtools/api/error.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Not needed.
  5. rbtools/api/error.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Two blank lines between these.
  6. rbtools/api/error.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Two blank lines between these.
  7. rbtools/api/error.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Wouldn't -1 just cause us to return the wrong error? Since it'd get the last entry in the array.
    
    I imagine this shouldn't default to anything. That way it's totally the caller's fault if specifying an incorrect parameter.
  8. rbtools/api/error.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    You can do this without the inspect module:
    
    for name, value in locals():
        if value != RequestError and issubclass(value, RequestError):
            request_errors[value.code] = value
  9. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Still would rather not have FETCH_RQUEST_METHOD.
  10. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    "Contains" and "requests"
  11. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    One line.
  12. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    "High"
  13. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Should use parens instead of \
  14. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    All this should probably be put in another branch somewhere, instead of in here. Or it should just be added. Right now, there's no way of knowing what the reasoning is.
  15. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Same with all these.
  16. rbtools/api/request.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    This function should be returning something, or it shouldn't be provided at all yet.
  17. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Blank line between these.
  18. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    Blank line between these.
  19. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    This can all probably be:
    
    setattr(resource, '__iter__', lambda: [i for i in lst])
  20. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Is this used anywhere yet?
  21. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    The parameter should only be indented 4 spaces.
  22. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Swap these. variable == value
  23. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    _iteritems
    
    The __ would cause the name to be mangled, making debugging harder.
  24. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
     
    Show all issues
    return [i for i in self._iteritems]
  25. rbtools/api/resource.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    How does this work asynchronously? There's no callback.
  26. rbtools/api/server.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Capital D.
  27. rbtools/api/server.py (Diff revision 1)
     
     
    Show all issues
    Should subclass object.
  28. 
      
MB
MB
MB
Review request changed

Status: Discarded

Loading...