• 
  
    
 
    
 
    

    



    
    
    
    
     
    




    
 
    

  
    



    
 

 

  

  

 

    


  
    





    
 
    



  

    
 
 
    
  
    Fix up some unicode vs. bytes issues in rbtools.api
    
 
    

    



 
    
 
    

  Review Request #9535
  —
  Created Jan. 25, 2018 and submitted 

 
    


    




    




    




 
    
  
    
   Information

  
    



    
 
 
    
  david
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  RBTools
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  master
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  b6b6e77...
 
    

    



 
    



 
    
  
    
   Reviewers

  
    



    
 
 
    
  rbtools
 
    

    





    
 
 
    
  
 
    

    



 
    



    


    
 
    




  

    
 
 
    
  
    There are a handful of places that were using the wrong data type within
    
the API wrappers in RBTools. This worked fine in Python 2 because
    
they're freely convertable, but would crash or otherwise fail under
    
Python 3. This change fixes those up.
    
 
    

    





  

    
 
 
    
  
    Ran unit tests under Python 2.7 and 3.6.
    
 
    

    




 
    

    





    
 
    









 





    
 
 
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
      
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
     
    • 
      
     
      • 
    
    
   
    
   
    
    
     
    
      Description
      From
      Last Updated
     
    
        
    



     
    
      
       
       
    The proper casing is what we had before. Why this change?
    
          		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     
    



     
    
      
       
       
    Might as well combine these. Doesn't look like we're re-using the request after this.
    
          		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

    




 
    

    



  
    
 
    

    


    












    
 




 

    


 













    
 





 
    
  
    
   
    



chipx86




   
    
   
    





    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     
chipx86


    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    


      




    1. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      2. 

















    2. 
 
      
  
  
      
  
 
      
  
      
   
      
    
     
      
      
       rbtools/api/cache.py
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
      
          
    
     
       
      

     
       
      

     
       
      

     
       
      

     
       
      

          
   
      
  
      
 
      

   
      
    
    




      
 
      
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
      

      



    
      The proper casing is what we had before. Why this change?
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  


      1. 
 
 
        
 
        
  
 
        
 
        
  
        Python 3's urllib.request.Request is calling key.capitalize() to normalize the header names to prevent conflicts (https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/urllib/request.py#L409). Unfortunately they don't do the same in has_header or get_header.
        

        All HTTP headers are case insensitive anyway so while it's annoying it's not really "incorrect"
        
 
        

        2. 



      2. 
 
 
        
 
        
  
 
        
 
        
  
        Ah okay, so it's a weird Python thing. Fine then.
        
 
        

        3. 


 
      


      

 
      

      3. 






    3. 
 
      
  
  
      
  
 
      
  
      
   
      
    
     
      
      
       rbtools/api/request.py
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
      
          
    
     
       
      

     
       
      

     
       
      

     
       
      

          
   
      
  
      
 
      

   
      
    
    




      
 
      
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
      

      



    
      Might as well combine these. Doesn't look like we're re-using the request after this.
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      4. 




    4. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      5. 


    

  
    
 
    

    












    
 



 
    
  
    
   
    



david




   
    
   
    
  
    
 
    


 

    












    
 





 
    
  
    
   
    



chipx86




   
    
   
    





    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     
chipx86


    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    


      




    1. 
 
      
  
      
   
      Ship It!
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      2. 















    2. 
 
      
  
      
   
      
  
      
 
      

 
      
  


      
 
      
 
        

  

 
      


      

 
      

      3. 


    

  
    
 
    

    












    
 



 
    
  
    
   
    



david




   
    
   
    
  
    
 
    


 
    
  
    

   
    
   
    
    
     Review request changed
    
    
   
    

  
    
  
    
  
    




    

  
    
   
    
    Status:
   
    
   
    

    Completed

   
    
  
    



  
    
   
    
    Change Summary:
   
    
   
    
    
    Pushed to master (ce1e422)