Please make sure that JavaScript is enabled in your browser. If you are using a browser extension to selectively enable or disable JavaScript, make sure it's enabled for this server.
Describe your changes (optional):
Describe the reason it's discarded (optional):
Review Request #9294 — Created Oct. 19, 2017 and discarded 7 years, 6 months ago
[Will fix it later] Created new Review Request Since the old one has leak from the bug fix
E501 line too long (118 > 79 characters)
E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 0
W291 trailing whitespace
You've ended up with two review requests for this change, probably by running rbt post when you intended to run rbt post -u (the other one is at /r/9246). Can you discard this one and make sure everything goes to the original one you posted?
rbt post
rbt post -u