• 
      

    Load extensions JS before page-specific code for reviewable pages.

    Review Request #9193 — Created Sept. 13, 2017 and submitted

    Information

    Review Board
    release-3.0.x
    8dee384...

    Reviewers

    Review request fields and entries now support extension-provided view classes,
    but the code that used them was parsing before the extension-provided JS was
    loaded, making things fail. I've overridden the relevant blocks for the
    view_diff.html and review_detail.html templates, loading all the JS before
    page-specific code.

    Used this in conjunction with an extension-provided field view class.

    Description From Last Updated

    Trying to get a better understanding of how things look here. At what point do we need the extension fields …

    chipx86chipx86

    Can you separate these with a blank line? Kinda blends in otherwise.

    chipx86chipx86

    Same here.

    chipx86chipx86
    chipx86
    1. 
        
    2. Show all issues

      Trying to get a better understanding of how things look here. At what point do we need the extension fields to be set up? I'm a little worried about the ordering here because some customer extensions expect a page to exist when they're initialized. Can we lazily look up the fields instead?

      1. This isn't requiring the fields to be set up, just defined. The problem is that we get a name resolution error because the extension fields haven't been defined at the time that the inline <script> is being parsed. Any extension JS that actually interacts with the page JS should (and in our cases at least, does) use RB.PageManager to wait until the page has finished initializing.

      2. This is the code in review_request_box.js, right? Can we maybe load that code at the end of the js_extensions block instead, so it's the last thing that happens?

    3. 
        
    david
    chipx86
    1. 
        
    2. Show all issues

      Can you separate these with a blank line? Kinda blends in otherwise.

    3. Show all issues

      Same here.

    4. 
        
    david
    chipx86
    1. Ship It!
    2. 
        
    david
    Review request changed
    Status:
    Completed
    Change Summary:
    Pushed to release-3.0.x (9102f42)