-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Best to do
Markdown_
and then have a block below like:.. _Markdown: http://....
Easier to reuse, and no links in the text.
-
-
-
Can we make this a little more explicit about how this was old behavior? Maybe just put "previously" in there.
-
-
-
-
-
Can you link to this resource? Should be able to do:
:ref:`Repository resource <webapi2.0-repository-resource>`
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"one level of children" is a bit confusing to me. I don't remember what's in this hook, so I have no idea what this means.
-
-
"a consolidated database representation" is kind of overly technical-sounding and doesn't mean anything to anybody who doesn't already know how this works. How about:
Starting in Review Board 1.7, newly uploaded diffs of files would be stored in the database only once, saving storage space if that particular file was used repeatedly in parent diffs or remained unchanged across several iterations of a change.
-
-
-
We weren't using this jsmin. We were using a separate Python-based jsmin rewrite that did not include this term.
The main reason we're leaving the Python jsmin is because it's largely unmaintained and does not offer some of the benefits of UglifyJS.
-
-
-
-
Given the above, it's not worth talking about the license here. Better to say it offers improvements over the version of jsmin we were using.
-
-
-
-
-
-
We're missing at least two names (Po-Chien Lin and Alessandro Menti). Should go through and make sure everyone is listed.
-
Let's not actually link this yet. I don't want to confuse people who view the release notes. We can just keep it in the tree instead.
-
WIP release notes for 2.0
Review Request #4861 — Created Oct. 30, 2013 and submitted
WIP release notes for 2.0
This change adds release notes for almost everything that's gone into the master
branch so far. There are a few things that are intentionally left out because
they're not ready for user consumption.
Built releasenotes docs and checked it out.
Description | From | Last Updated |
---|---|---|
That will have to be updated now. |
chipx86 | |
Missing a trailing period. |
chipx86 | |
Hmm, you shouldn't need this format. I always do: * Blah blah blah. * Blah blah.. |
chipx86 | |
"request" |
chipx86 | |
Best to do Markdown_ and then have a block below like: .. _Markdown: http://.... Easier to reuse, and no links … |
chipx86 | |
Should be consistent with using "Markdown". |
chipx86 | |
We should link to the page describing GitHub's extensions. |
chipx86 | |
Can we make this a little more explicit about how this was old behavior? Maybe just put "previously" in there. |
chipx86 | |
"thumbnails" |
chipx86 | |
Can you use :guilabel: for these? |
chipx86 | |
This made it into 1.7.16, and is documented there. |
chipx86 | |
Hmm, I believe this is in 1.7.5. Certainly, 1.7.x releases already do this. |
chipx86 | |
Can you link to this resource? Should be able to do: :ref:`Repository resource <webapi2.0-repository-resource>` |
chipx86 | |
Same with Repository List resource. |
chipx86 | |
Same with these resources. |
chipx86 | |
We'll need these filled in for the beta. |
chipx86 | |
Should link this resource. |
chipx86 | |
"JavaScript" |
chipx86 | |
These tags are on all pages we ship. I think it's confusing to have them in the release notes. |
chipx86 | |
Can we have literal quotes around that path? |
chipx86 | |
"one level of children" is a bit confusing to me. I don't remember what's in this hook, so I have … |
chipx86 | |
We should have a blurb about this for the beta. |
chipx86 | |
"a consolidated database representation" is kind of overly technical-sounding and doesn't mean anything to anybody who doesn't already know how … |
chipx86 | |
"have to make" or "has to make"? "have" sounds odd here. |
chipx86 | |
"JavaScript" |
chipx86 | |
We weren't using this jsmin. We were using a separate Python-based jsmin rewrite that did not include this term. The … |
chipx86 | |
Should use jsmin_ and have a .. _jsmin: http:// link below. |
chipx86 | |
"JavaScript" |
chipx86 | |
Should use UglifyJS_ and .. _UglifyJS: http://. |
chipx86 | |
Given the above, it's not worth talking about the license here. Better to say it offers improvements over the version … |
chipx86 | |
Can you use literal quotes for these fields? |
chipx86 | |
Here, too: issue_opened, issue_status, open, null. |
chipx86 | |
Should probably use :guilabel: here. |
chipx86 | |
"offter"? |
chipx86 | |
Should use literal quotes around /r/ here and in the description. |
chipx86 | |
We're missing at least two names (Po-Chien Lin and Alessandro Menti). Should go through and make sure everyone is listed. |
chipx86 | |
Let's not actually link this yet. I don't want to confuse people who view the release notes. We can just … |
chipx86 | |
Two blank lines. |
chipx86 | |
1.7.18. |
chipx86 | |
Now that 1.7.18 has this, we can remove it from these release notes. |
chipx86 |
- Description:
-
WIP release notes for 2.0
~ This change adds release notes for everything that's gone into the master
~ branch so far. There are a few TODO sections for things where we either haven't ~ finalized the look or behavior, or things that I didn't feel comfortable ~ This change adds release notes for almost everything that's gone into the master
~ branch so far. There are a few things that are intentionally left out because ~ they're not ready for user consumption. - writing about without going back to look at the change. - Diff:
-
Revision 2 (+529)
- Diff:
-
Revision 3 (+524)