Correct typing in the conditions compatibility file.
Review Request #14732 — Created Dec. 9, 2025 and submitted — Latest diff uploaded
We recently added a conditions compatibility file to Review Bot (/r/14705/), and in those reviews we decided on a new best pattern for compatibility imports that keep the type checker happy. This change updates the compatibility file here to use that pattern. The pattern ensures that we're giving the type checker one path to check based on the upstream, making sure we're always typing against the formal API instead of the compatibility stubs.
- Saw things are typed properly when I import and use the conditions
field into another file. - Looked at an integration config page on an RB 7.1 server.