• 
      

    Update a few more places to use run_process() instead of execute().

    Review Request #14482 — Created June 27, 2025 and submitted

    Information

    RBTools
    master

    Reviewers

    This change updates the install and land commands to use the
    run_process method, along with a few additional test cases.

    Ran unit tests.

    Summary ID
    Update a few more places to use run_process() instead of execute().
    This change updates the install and land commands to use the `run_process` method, along with a few additional test cases. Testing Done: Ran unit tests.
    d1703e4b3655142711023d39d836240f5a36339e
    Description From Last Updated

    This should be Sequence.

    chipx86chipx86

    Closing ) should be on the next line, aligned with python_version.

    chipx86chipx86

    This can use the common chaining form for run_process(): return ( run_process(...) .stdout.read() )

    chipx86chipx86
    chipx86
    1. 
        
    2. rbtools/commands/tests/test_main.py (Diff revision 1)
       
       
      Show all issues

      This should be Sequence.

    3. rbtools/commands/tests/test_main.py (Diff revision 1)
       
       
       
       
      Show all issues

      Closing ) should be on the next line, aligned with python_version.

    4. rbtools/commands/tests/test_main.py (Diff revision 1)
       
       
       
       
       
      Show all issues

      This can use the common chaining form for run_process():

      return (
          run_process(...)
          .stdout.read()
      )
      
      1. Oops:

        return (
            run_process(...)
            .stdout
            .read()
        )
        
    5. 
        
    david
    maubin
    1. Ship It!
    2. 
        
    chipx86
    1. Ship It!
    2. 
        
    david
    Review request changed
    Status:
    Completed
    Change Summary:
    Pushed to master (f9395a7)