Comment serialization cleanup part 1: Break out basic definition.

 






 

 


  Review Request #13655
  —
  Created March 21, 2024 and submitted 

 




















 

  

   Information

  





 
 

  david
 









 
 

  Review Board
 









 
 

  release-7.x
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  
 






 




 

  

   Reviewers

  





 
 

  reviewboard
 









 
 

  
 






 








 





  


 
 

  
The way comments are serialized for use in Review UIs and the diff

viewer is extremely messy. This change is the first step of cleaning

that up.


When I first converted the comment models to TypeScript, I mistakenly

marked the comment editor and comment dialog view's publishedComments

as being BaseComment[]. These are in fact the serialized comment data

arrays. This change moves the definition of the serialized comment

interface out of abstractCommentBlockModel.ts into its own file, where

we can import it anywhere we need, and makes use of that definition

where appropriate.

 








  


 
 

  
Ran js-tests.

 







 









 





  

 


 
 

  



 

  
   


    Summary
    ID

   

  
  

   


    

     

      Comment serialization cleanup part 1: Break out basic definition.
      
The way comments are serialized for use in Review UIs and the diff
viewer is extremely messy. This change is the first step of cleaning
that up.

When I first converted the comment models to TypeScript, I mistakenly
marked the comment editor and comment dialog view's `publishedComments`
as being `BaseComment[]`. These are in fact the serialized comment data
arrays. This change moves the definition of the serialized comment
interface out of `abstractCommentBlockModel.ts` into its own file, where
we can import it anywhere we need, and makes use of that definition
where appropriate.

Testing Done:
Ran js-tests.

     


    		
    de136a2ca4f428f967610da03047f135c16ac36c

   



  
 




 













 






 
 
 

  

   

    

     
    

    
    
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
    

   

   

    
     

      Description
      From
      Last Updated
     

    
    



     

      
       
       
This should probably be import type. Same applies to other serialized type imports in the change.

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
Just to throw out the question here, do we want to alphabetize by imported name, or group type separately from …

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     


    
   

  

 







 






  

 



















 




 




 














 



 

  

   




david




   

   

  

 



 















 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/static/rb/js/reviews/models/abstractCommentBlockModel.ts
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    This should probably be import type.
    

    Same applies to other serialized type imports in the change.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  3. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




david




   

   

  

 



 















 





 

  

   




maubin




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
maubin


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    Ship It!
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/static/rb/js/reviews/models/screenshotReviewableModel.ts
       


        (Diff revisions 1 - 2)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    Just to throw out the question here, do we want to alphabetize by imported name, or group type separately from non-type within the list? I kind of like the idea of keeping them in separate groups within the same import list, so it's very clear where things go and each grouping can be sorted independently.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      We can group them. I'll update /r/13713/ to do that everywhere.
      
 
      

      2. 


 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  3. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




david




   

   

  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 Review request changed

    
   


  

  

  







  

   

    Status:
   

   


    Completed

   

  




  

   

    Change Summary:
   

   

    
Pushed to release-7.x (85bb0dc)