Add draft release notes for RBTools 3.0.
Review Request #12134 — Created March 10, 2022 and submitted
This change adds release notes for the new features and improvements
that will ship as RBTools 3.0.
Built HTML and checked output.
Summary | ID |
---|---|
a8de8227369ca750663d6535c2f2a0d995723d1b |
Description | From | Last Updated |
---|---|---|
Some missing changes: More detail on the repository architectural changes and command changes (3fbea5f, 37728c4, a98f021, 53b7208, 35275e6) for people … |
chipx86 | |
Things look good for the most part, but the "Other Improvements" section feels a bit disorganized. Some entries are new … |
chipx86 | |
Typo: "Fetaures" -> "Features" |
chipx86 | |
We should specify the minimum version of Review Board required for this (I recommend we just say 4.0.6, given the … |
chipx86 | |
Rather than "a new backend," let's say "new repository support" Also, rather than the "... more powerful", maybe we could … |
chipx86 | |
"new new" support! :) |
chipx86 | |
The backticks aren't needed in the definitions. |
chipx86 | |
Let's sell this better. Can we talk about the capabilities this provides? |
chipx86 | |
We don't document any of these right now, do we? We should probably have tasks for that. |
chipx86 | |
Missing a period. |
chipx86 | |
Mind double-checking that they're all in AUTHORS? |
chipx86 |
-
-
Some missing changes:
-
More detail on the repository architectural changes and command changes (3fbea5f, 37728c4, a98f021, 53b7208, 35275e6) for people building on top of RBTools.
-
Deprecation of
TREES
(7c0b6b0)
(The following are in
release-2.0.x
, but aren't released.)- Fixes to the default
User-Agent
value sent in API requests (5558459 — Lukasz Kawczynski) - Custom commands and aliases now show up in
--help
(b9e4c9b — Matthew Blythe) - Fixes for excluded/included files affecting full Git diffs (97d6a9a — Andrej Radovi?)
-
-
-
We should specify the minimum version of Review Board required for this (I recommend we just say 4.0.6, given the new diff functionality was added in 4.0.5 and things fixed up in 4.0.6).
-
Rather than "a new backend," let's say "new repository support"
Also, rather than the "... more powerful", maybe we could say something like:
"... HCL VersionVault and IBM ClearCase, built in cooperation with HCL. This replaces the old community-driven ClearCase implementation in Review Board, offering better compatibility, official support, and modern functionality. It includes ..."
-
-
-
-
-
- Commits:
-
Summary ID d471638fadacfec839760a5963955008df261fb6 5746303868fe62f0e6b5b3e4788416699e92bc1b