Switch away from iteration shims.

 






 

 


  Review Request #11850
  —
  Created Oct. 14, 2021 and submitted 

 




















 

  

   Information

  





 
 

  david
 









 
 

  Review Board
 









 
 

  master
 









 
 

  
 









 
 

  
 






 




 

  

   Reviewers

  





 
 

  reviewboard
 









 
 

  
 






 








 





  


 
 

  
In the Python 2 to 3 conversion, many iteration methods (such as

items() and keys() were changed from returning lists to iterators.

In order to be correct in usage everywhere, we used six to ensure

consistent behavior across versions. Now that we're Python 3+ only on

the master branch, we can get rid of these and just use the builtins.

 








  


 
 

  
Ran unit tests.

 







 









 





  

 


 
 

  



 

  
   


    Summary
    ID

   

  
  

   


    

     

      Switch away from iteration shims.
      
In the Python 2 to 3 conversion, many iteration methods (such as
`items()` and `keys()` were changed from returning lists to iterators.
In order to be correct in usage everywhere, we used `six` to ensure
consistent behavior across versions. Now that we're Python 3+ only on
the master branch, we can get rid of these and just use the builtins.

Testing Done:
Ran unit tests.

     


    		
    e62db00a4e531d577797df057de1f85ab4f67d1a

   



  
 




 













 






 
 
 

  

   

    

     
    

    
    
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
     
  • 
      
     
    • 
    

   

   

    
     

      Description
      From
      Last Updated
     

    
    



     

      
       
       
Can we use a keyword argument per line?

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
While here, can we modernize this? all_text_types_extra_data = { _key: {} for _key in extra_text_type_fields.keys() }

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
While here, let's make this a bit nicer/less wasteful and use { ... } instead of set([ ... ]).

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
So here's a question. Why were we even doing this before? Aren't we going from dict to dict? Can't we …

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
I think this can just be list(self.commits.values()).

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
Same here.

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     




     

      
       
       
While here, can we make this a modern dict comprehension?

      		
      
       chipx86chipx86
      
      
       
      
     


    
   

  

 







 






  

 



















 




 




 














 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      The review on /r/11854/ is relevant to this change as well.
      
 
      

      2. 


 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/avatars/templatetags/avatars.py
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    Can we use a keyword argument per line?
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 






  3. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/webapi/mixins.py
       


        (Diff revision 1)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    While here, can we modernize this?
    

    

    all_text_types_extra_data = {
    _key: {}
    for _key in extra_text_type_fields.keys()
}

    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    4. 




  4. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    5. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




david




   

   

  

 



 















 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 

















  2. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/accounts/backends/standard.py
       


        (Diff revision 2)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    While here, let's make this a bit nicer/less wasteful and use { ... } instead of set([ ... ]).
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 






  3. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/avatars/templatetags/avatars.py
       


        (Diff revision 2)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    So here's a question. Why were we even doing this before? Aren't we going from dict to dict? Can't we just copy the result of get_avatar_urls()?
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      I really don't know. Copy/pasteo from inside the avatar services where we have a similar thing but it's calling get_absolute_url, perhaps?
      
 
      

      2. 


 
    


    

 
    

    4. 






  4. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/diffviewer/tests/test_commit_utils.py
       


        (Diff revision 2)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    I think this can just be list(self.commits.values()).
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    5. 






  5. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/diffviewer/tests/test_commit_utils.py
       


        (Diff revision 2)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    Same here.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    6. 






  6. 
 
    
  
  
    
  
 
    
  
    
   
    
    
     
    
      
       reviewboard/reviews/builtin_fields.py
       


        (Diff revision 2)


       
      
     
    
        
    
     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

     
     
    

        
   
    
  
    
 
    

   
    
    
    




    
 
    
  
  
  

  
  
   Show all issues
  
 
    

    



    
    While here, can we make this a modern dict comprehension?
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    7. 




  7. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    8. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




david




   

   

  

 



 















 





 

  

   




chipx86




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
chipx86


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    Ship It!
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




david




   

   

  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 Review request changed

    
   


  

  

  







  

   

    Status:
   

   


    Completed

   

  




  

   

    Change Summary:
   

   

    
Pushed to release-5.0.x (5dafe99)